🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming damages valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to use immobilized Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in local news outlets, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

EU leaders will decide later this week on a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the main keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

EU officials have argued that their proposal is legally sound. They argue rests on the fact that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in European countries shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, including seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear refused to provide a statement on the new legal action. The institution has previously noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While judges in EU countries are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly nations, provided that relevant holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

EU officials indicated they are working on measures to deter other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay untouched.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to repay the money if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to fund a loan, using unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that if you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."